Employee Relations in Contemporary Organisations Essay

Employee Relations in modern-day Organisations - Essay ExampleThe main impetus for employee relations is the need for participation in management and the boost of participation as a result of democracy (Blyton and Turnbull, 2004 p276). They state that participation is by definition a higher-trust and positive-sum activity where the emphasis is placed on the shared resolution of issues to the mutual benefit and gain of those bear on (Blyton and Turnbull, 2004 p276). This implies that participation is an appropriate means through which both employers and employees can resolve their differences. However, the idea of participation guide to the creation of trade unions and the incorporation of trade unionist policies in workplaces (Blyton and Turnbull, 2004). Also, the inclusion of European social policies support bargain and collective participation. Evolution from the Old Unionism Boxall and Purcell (2003) identify that the old industrial relations of the premature 20th century wa s about control and stability and gaining agreements to keep the production system going and avoiding debauched conflicts. These arrangements were not legally enforceable. However, the post-war era ushered in a new period where participation of employees in organizations was through with(p) through unions. These unions were representatives of employees through collective bargaining arrangements. Collective bargaining is defined as a function through which representation of employers and employee organizations act as joint creators of substantive and procedural rules regulating employment (Blyton and Turnbull, 2004 p226). In other words, these were situations where important and relevant issues between employers and employees were discussed. The most common substantive issue is the demand for fairer wages. Also, it involved the drill of a clearly laid down procedure or system whereby employees could assert their demands based on the market value of their collective supply of labo r. Most businesses after 1950 had unions. The only exceptions were traditionalist organizations that hated trade unionism and sophisticated paternalists who had management policies which substituted for the unions presence (Blyton and Turnbull, 2004 p303). However, towards the 21st century, employee relations evolved after the old system of tripartite negotiations collapsed. In the 1980s, trade unionism and collective bargaining fell because of three main things 1. There was a step-down the proportion of employees covered by collective bargaining arrangements. 2. There was a growing tendency for those arrangements to be local rather than national and 3. The narrowing of the scope of collective bargaining. In 1984, 70% of employees were members of collective bargaining groups. However, in the 1980s, the structures of the trade unions were exposed because they were not capable of dealing with the economic restructuring (Blyton and Turnbull, 2004). In 1990, only 52% of workers were me mbers of collective bargaining groups. By 1998, this figure had fallen to 40%. Today, the main framework of employee relations implicate three main elements science building, problem-solving, ethical systems(Kaufman, 2004 p42).